Reading science fiction stories enables people with poor grasp in English to improve their grammar skills. Talking and writing in broken English is the end result of not understanding how the structure of this English sentence work. Through routine studying, you will learn the appropriate way to write a correct English sentence. There are sci-fi tales at different reading difficulty levels. You can start from the one with simple reading difficulty level which has shorter duration and slowly progress to reading stories with harder studying difficulty that have longer length.
As you read the science fiction narrative, you will encounter words that you don’t know. Every time you come across a difficult word, you should look up the dictionary and find out its significance. If you didn’t purchase a dictionary, you can use the online dictionary to look up the meaning of this word. You can discover how to pronounce the new word correctly by playing the audio for your pronunciation in the internet dictionary. The more science fiction tales you see, the broader your vocabulary will become.
Well, that depends on the type of story you’re writing. The period of your narrative will dictate the amount of character information you’ll have to create them come to life. For simplicity’s sake, I have broken my personality sheet to what I use for each type of writing. Your character sheets may vary.
Fiction by its very definition is unreal. When we see a novel we know that the story and the characters in it are only a product of creativity of the writer. When we view a film we are aware that the characters are only acting their parts essentially pretending to be someone besides themselves. Still we’re emotionally affected by the twists and turns in the narrative. We laugh with them, weep with them, and also sense indignant towards the bad men. The lovable hero or heroine might be despicable in real life and the protagonist may be a perfect gentleman, but we identify them with the characters they’re portraying. In essence for that brief period we ourselves get hauled to the imaginary world of the writer. Oddly enough this happens too with the author at least to some of these. He or she goes through the very same emotions while writing and perhaps later also. There is so much for you to learn about visit their website, and we definitely can help you in this area. Take a look at what is happening on your end, and that may help you to refine what you need. Just be sure you pick those items that will serve your needs the most. How each one will play out in your situation is largely unknown, but we each have to consider that. The latter half of our discussion will center on a few highly relevant issues as they concern your possible circumstances.
“Knowledge is limited, imagination is not.” Albert Einstein explained that even though the wording of the next part might have been different. Einstein like any other human being was not infallible. A number of his views he held right till the ending turned out to be incorrect even within the subject of physics. In this particular announcement he also seems to have it backwards. Knowledge may be restricted in the case of someone but in general it is unlimited even if we consider just logical knowledge leaving aside transcendental. Science in particular has demonstrated this at every step in the course of its own development. Imagination pertains to a single mind and can be constrained by numerous factors based on the situation of the person. A mind can envision only what happens in some way to things already stored in it. Someone who has been outdoors a remote place in wilderness and has no contact with the world outside cannot imagine what metropolitan cities are like.
Getting back to fiction that the creativity of the author also has to be predicated on his direct or indirect encounters. In this sense fiction is based on fact and to this extent it represents just another dimension of reality. Here of course we run into the philosophical problem of the precise significance of reality. There are two diametrically opposite views – materialistic and spiritualistic. According to the former only things that can be perceived through our perceptions are real, everything else is unreal. The latter maintains that there is just one ultimate fact from which all that we perceive comes out and what that is perceived is only an illusion. We again consider a statement by Einstein: “Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one.” He was clearly referring to the fact of this phenomenal world. The term illusion can have different connotations but in general it means perceiving something rather different from what it is. So the existence of this thing is a prerequisite for illusion, it isn’t a mental construction. Imagination is a mental phenomenon and has nothing to do with whatever actually existing. Thus the connection between fiction and reality is completely different from that between illusion and reality. It does take some time to write a complete story for any kind of book.
In a philosophical sense the incredible world itself could be regarded as fiction. That is what Shakespeare perhaps meant when he wrote: “All the world’s a stage, and all women and men merely players”. We may also think of everything in the world (space, time, matter) as players because everything has its entrance and exit. We naturally run into the issue of saying what the point is and who wrote the script. Shakespeare most probably believed in God, strict determinism, also at the reality of the world, so he did not have this problem. Now it is generally believed that the world also has a beginning and will have an end. If the world is also a player, are there multiple universes or does this come alone on the stage and then presents other players? But what’s the stage in this case? Quantum physics points to a single possibility. At extremely tiny scales of space and time there is a quantum void that’s not really empty but filled with energy that is constantly transforming itself to virtual particles and back. What remains after the conclusion of the universe may be an infinite variation of this quantum emptiness filled with energy into which all the thing has converted itself. This universal energy is the source of and background for everything.
It is not only a philosophical point either. We spend a substantial part of our own life from the imagined or fictional universe. We muse about the things in future and also live over the past imagining what might have been. The creativity about the future is dependent on our hopes and ambitions and also to some extent it is a positive in the sense we’re in a position to mold our future if we sincerely attempt. But musing over the past is really a futile exercise because we all know for a fact that ‘what might have been’ is only fantasy that never happened. Nevertheless it serves the exact same purpose as fiction in the point of view of amusement. We amuse ourselves by imagining how life would have been, knowing fully well that it has no fact whatsoever. In a metaphorical sense past, at the distant past, is fiction. At a certain sense history is fiction since it always contains the subjective bias of the author. What we know of Buddha and Jesus now is more fiction than facts.